0.05/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.05/0.11 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM 0.15/0.31 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu 0.15/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.15/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.15/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.15/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.15/0.31 % CPULimit : 1920 0.15/0.31 % WCLimit : 240 0.15/0.31 % DateTime : Wed Jul 30 02:28:04 EDT 2025 0.15/0.32 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.44 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.15/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NyX3pKRUBY/E---3.1_2177.p 0.15/0.48 # Version: 3.0.0-ho 0.15/0.48 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA. 0.15/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.15/0.48 # Starting sh2lt with 960s (4) cores 0.15/0.48 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.48 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.48 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.48 # Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 240s (1) cores 0.15/0.48 # sh2lt with pid 2255 completed with status 0 0.15/0.48 # Result found by sh2lt 0.15/0.48 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA. 0.15/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.15/0.48 # Starting sh2lt with 960s (4) cores 0.15/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true) 0.15/0.48 # Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN 0.15/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 4 cores with 960 seconds (960 total) 0.15/0.48 # Starting ehoh_best6_lambda with 577s (1) cores 0.15/0.48 # Starting ehoh_best_sine with 97s (1) cores 0.15/0.48 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 97s (1) cores 0.15/0.48 # Starting sh2lt with 97s (1) cores 0.15/0.48 # sh2lt with pid 2266 completed with status 0 0.15/0.48 # Result found by sh2lt 0.15/0.48 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA. 0.15/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.15/0.48 # Starting sh2lt with 960s (4) cores 0.15/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true) 0.15/0.48 # Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN 0.15/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 4 cores with 960 seconds (960 total) 0.15/0.48 # Starting ehoh_best6_lambda with 577s (1) cores 0.15/0.48 # Starting ehoh_best_sine with 97s (1) cores 0.15/0.48 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 97s (1) cores 0.15/0.48 # Starting sh2lt with 97s (1) cores 0.15/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.15/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.15/0.48 0.15/0.48 # Proof found! 0.15/0.48 # SZS status Theorem 0.15/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.15/0.48 thf(decl_23, type, epred1_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o). 0.15/0.48 thf(decl_24, type, epred2_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o). 0.15/0.48 thf(decl_25, type, epred3_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o). 0.15/0.48 thf(decl_26, type, epred4_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o). 0.15/0.48 thf(cTHM120_2_pme, conjecture, ?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:((((?[X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:(~((X1 @ X2 @ X3)))&![X4:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X4 @ X4)))&![X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o, X6:$i > $o]:(((X1 @ X4 @ X6)<=((X1 @ X4 @ X5)&(X1 @ X5 @ X6)))))&?[X7:$i > $o, X8:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X7 @ X8)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NyX3pKRUBY/E---3.1_2177.p', cTHM120_2_pme)). 0.15/0.48 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:((((?[X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:(~((X1 @ X2 @ X3)))&![X4:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X4 @ X4)))&![X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o, X6:$i > $o]:((((X1 @ X4 @ X5)&(X1 @ X5 @ X6))=>(X1 @ X4 @ X6))))&?[X7:$i > $o, X8:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X7 @ X8))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM120_2_pme])])). 0.15/0.48 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X18:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o, X19:$i > $o, X20:$i > $o, X25:$i > $o, X26:$i > $o]:(((((X18 @ (epred2_1 @ X18) @ (epred3_1 @ X18))|((X18 @ X19 @ X20)|~(X18 @ (epred1_1 @ X18) @ (epred1_1 @ X18)))|~(X18 @ X25 @ X26))&((X18 @ (epred3_1 @ X18) @ (epred4_1 @ X18))|((X18 @ X19 @ X20)|~(X18 @ (epred1_1 @ X18) @ (epred1_1 @ X18)))|~(X18 @ X25 @ X26)))&(~(X18 @ (epred2_1 @ X18) @ (epred4_1 @ X18))|((X18 @ X19 @ X20)|~(X18 @ (epred1_1 @ X18) @ (epred1_1 @ X18)))|~(X18 @ X25 @ X26)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])). 0.15/0.48 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o, X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o]:(((X1 @ X2 @ X3)|~((X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred1_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ X4 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.48 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o, X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ X2 @ X3)|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred1_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ X4 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.48 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:((((X2)=(X3))|((epred4_1 @ $eq)!=(epred2_1 @ $eq)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_3])])). 0.15/0.48 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:((((epred3_1 @ $eq)=(epred2_1 @ $eq))|((X2)=(X3)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_4])])). 0.15/0.48 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X29:$i]:((((X2 @ X29)<=>(X3 @ X29))|((epred4_1 @ $eq)!=(epred2_1 @ $eq)))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.15/0.48 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o, X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred3_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ X2 @ X3)|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred1_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ X4 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.15/0.48 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((epred3_1 @ $eq)=(epred2_1 @ $eq)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])). 0.15/0.48 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X29:$i]:(((X2 @ X29)|((epred4_1 @ $eq)!=(epred2_1 @ $eq))|~((X3 @ X29)))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.15/0.48 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:(((X2)=(X3))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_8])]), c_0_9]), c_0_5])). 0.15/0.48 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(flex_resolve,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])]), ['proof']). 0.15/0.48 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.15/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 1 0.15/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.15/0.48 # Initial clauses : 3 0.15/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.15/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3 0.15/0.48 # Processed clauses : 24 0.15/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 1 0.15/0.48 # ...subsumed : 2 0.15/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 20 0.15/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 21 0.15/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.15/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 5 0.15/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.15/0.48 # Generated clauses : 129 0.15/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 89 0.15/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.15/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1 0.15/0.48 # Paramodulations : 37 0.15/0.48 # Factorizations : 15 0.15/0.48 # NegExts : 2 0.15/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 21 0.15/0.48 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.15/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 4 0.15/0.48 # ...of those cached : 3 0.15/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.15/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0 0.15/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.15/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.15/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.15/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.15/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.15/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.15/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.15/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.15/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 7 0.15/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0 0.15/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1 0.15/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 0 0.15/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 6 0.15/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 66 0.15/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 246 0.15/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.15/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 13 0.15/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 25 0.15/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18 0.15/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3 0.15/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12 0.15/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 26 0.15/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 57 0.15/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 19 0.15/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.15/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0 0.15/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10248 0.15/0.48 # Search garbage collected termcells : 167 0.15/0.48 0.15/0.48 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.48 # User time : 0.007 s 0.15/0.48 # System time : 0.002 s 0.15/0.48 # Total time : 0.009 s 0.15/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1848 pages 0.15/0.48 0.15/0.48 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.15/0.48 # User time : 0.024 s 0.15/0.48 # System time : 0.008 s 0.15/0.48 # Total time : 0.031 s 0.15/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages 0.15/0.48 % E exiting 0.15/0.48 % E exiting 0.15/0.48 EOF